The question sprang up in my mind after I watched the recent screen version of “Jane Eyre”. I will not write a proper film review here, if you don’t mind. Just a couple of pros and cons.
Muted colours and lights which look close to the period and the book and Judi Dench as housekeeper Mrs. Fairfax are obviously pros.
The list of cons is much longer. First of all, I did not like the game with temporal shifts; it did not add to the dramatic effect and it broke the narration. As to the heroine, Mia Wasikowska playing the titular part is probably the rising Hollywood star but she is not Jane Eyre. Bronte’s Jane is not pretty, we know, yet she’s got a spirit.
You remember her 1st meeting with Mr. Rochester? As he put it, “She began by felling my horse." Could this ghost-like creature, a shadow of a girl have done this? There’s more to criticize, but that is not the point.
Somehow the film made me think – Books or movies? It is not as simple as it looks and the cliché no-film-is-as-good-as-the-novel does not always work. My view is that the film based on the book should at least deliver the story and recreate the tone of the original.
What is it that turns a book into a good film?
How does a bad novel become a much better movie sometimes? Any idea?



